Gebrechlichkeit
2025-04-01, 07:26:13
surs: https://perfectpacman.com/2025/03/18/karl-update/
discussion: https://old.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1joixt4/billy_mitchell_wins_lawsuit_against_youtuber_karl/
## Summary
In an unexpected turn of events, the long-anticipated legal battle between Karl Jobst and Billy Mitchell concluded with a verdict that shocked many. Presided over by a Queensland court in Australia, and coincidentally set to be delivered on April Fools' Day, the judgment went in favor of Billy Mitchell, a character mired in controversy and previously accused of cheating in the video game space. The court found Karl Jobst guilty of defamation against Mitchell and ordered him to pay a substantial sum in damages amounting to approximately AUD 350,000 plus interest, translating to around USD 250,000. This case, which stemmed from accusations made by Jobst against Mitchell related to the video game legend's alleged involvement in the death of another gamer, Apollo Legend, was closely followed by the gaming community for its implications on free speech and the accountability of public figures.
The judgment has sparked a flurry of reactions, with many expressing disappointment and disbelief at the outcome, particularly given the hefty damages awarded. Critics argue that the ruling serves more as a win for the perpetuation of Mitchell's already tarnished reputation rather than a genuine vindication of his character. Despite this setback, Jobst's allegations regarding Mitchell's questionable achievements in gaming, such as his Donkey Kong scores, remain a separate discussion, untouched by the court's decision.
Comments from readers and involved parties post-verdict reveal a mix of support for Karl, criticism of the legal proceedings, and continued disdain for Mitchell. Notably, the discourse highlights the complexities of defamation law in Australia, contrasting with U.S. legal standards, and critiques the apparent technical failures of Jobst's legal representation. This outcome not only signifies a personal defeat for Karl Jobst but also prompts a broader conversation about the power dynamics in gaming history documentation, the legal challenges in proving defamation, and the enduring debate over Billy Mitchell's legacy in the gaming world.
This verdict does not conclude the contentious debate over Mitchell's place in gaming history but instead signals a new chapter in the ongoing saga surrounding his legacy, integrity, and the lengths to which individuals will go to defend their reputations in the fiercely passionate and often unforgiving realm of competitive gaming.
All die Jahre habe ich die Videos von Karl J. ueber Mitchell verfolgt und wurde, wie viele andere, seit Jahren auf eine falsche Faehrte geleitet, gefuehrt. Ich dachte diese ganze Zeit, der Prozess zwischen beide Parteien ginge um 'Mitchells falsche Behauptungen' und nicht wie man heute lesen kann:
Wenn ich es richtig verstanden habe (reddit): 'Jobst hatte um Geld gebeten (via GoFund?), um Mitchell eines Su**ids zu beschuldigen und nicht um Mitchells Pacman Weltrecord aus den 80er.'
discussion: https://old.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1joixt4/billy_mitchell_wins_lawsuit_against_youtuber_karl/
## Summary
In an unexpected turn of events, the long-anticipated legal battle between Karl Jobst and Billy Mitchell concluded with a verdict that shocked many. Presided over by a Queensland court in Australia, and coincidentally set to be delivered on April Fools' Day, the judgment went in favor of Billy Mitchell, a character mired in controversy and previously accused of cheating in the video game space. The court found Karl Jobst guilty of defamation against Mitchell and ordered him to pay a substantial sum in damages amounting to approximately AUD 350,000 plus interest, translating to around USD 250,000. This case, which stemmed from accusations made by Jobst against Mitchell related to the video game legend's alleged involvement in the death of another gamer, Apollo Legend, was closely followed by the gaming community for its implications on free speech and the accountability of public figures.
The judgment has sparked a flurry of reactions, with many expressing disappointment and disbelief at the outcome, particularly given the hefty damages awarded. Critics argue that the ruling serves more as a win for the perpetuation of Mitchell's already tarnished reputation rather than a genuine vindication of his character. Despite this setback, Jobst's allegations regarding Mitchell's questionable achievements in gaming, such as his Donkey Kong scores, remain a separate discussion, untouched by the court's decision.
Comments from readers and involved parties post-verdict reveal a mix of support for Karl, criticism of the legal proceedings, and continued disdain for Mitchell. Notably, the discourse highlights the complexities of defamation law in Australia, contrasting with U.S. legal standards, and critiques the apparent technical failures of Jobst's legal representation. This outcome not only signifies a personal defeat for Karl Jobst but also prompts a broader conversation about the power dynamics in gaming history documentation, the legal challenges in proving defamation, and the enduring debate over Billy Mitchell's legacy in the gaming world.
This verdict does not conclude the contentious debate over Mitchell's place in gaming history but instead signals a new chapter in the ongoing saga surrounding his legacy, integrity, and the lengths to which individuals will go to defend their reputations in the fiercely passionate and often unforgiving realm of competitive gaming.
All die Jahre habe ich die Videos von Karl J. ueber Mitchell verfolgt und wurde, wie viele andere, seit Jahren auf eine falsche Faehrte geleitet, gefuehrt. Ich dachte diese ganze Zeit, der Prozess zwischen beide Parteien ginge um 'Mitchells falsche Behauptungen' und nicht wie man heute lesen kann:
Wenn ich es richtig verstanden habe (reddit): 'Jobst hatte um Geld gebeten (via GoFund?), um Mitchell eines Su**ids zu beschuldigen und nicht um Mitchells Pacman Weltrecord aus den 80er.'